Pit Bull Incidents Outnumber Other Dog Attacks 2 to 1

County officials say pit bulls attack and are labeled "dangerous" more often than other dogs.

Between 2009 and 2010, there were 233 reported incidents involving pit bull attacks against people and other dogs in Anne Arundel County. In that same time frame, the next closest breeds, German shepherds and Labrador retrievers, caused just 93 incidents combined. 

According to Lt. Glenn Shanahan of Anne Arundel County Animal Control, pit bull terriers lead all other breeds in the county by at least two to one when it comes to attacks over the last five years.

“The numbers say what they say. We’re not making it up,” Shanahan said. “It’s demonstrably overwhelming.”

A man in Severn two weeks ago after the dog and another pit bull engaged in fight.

Just two days later, a man in Severna Park shot and killed a pit bull after  in his backyard in the 300 block of Benfield Road, he said. Apparently, it wasn't the first incident involving a pit bull on that block.

According to Animal Control service call documents acquired by Severna Park Patch, the agency was contacted three times between March 2009 and January 2011 concerning complaints about a pit bull at 302 Benfield Road in Severna Park. The calls were from an anonymous citizen, with complaints of a pit bull running loose and and two pit bulls outside tied to a tree with no food or water. There were no charges placed in any of the incidents after the agency responded to the calls.

While this month's shooting incidents both involved pit bulls, the man from Severna Park was arrested on site and charged with discharging a firearm in a residential area and animal cruelty, but the shooting in Severn resulted in no charges by the police department.

Kristin Fleckenstein, a spokeswoman for the state’s attorney’s office, tried to explain the difference between the two situations.

The spokeswoman said police officers are not required to contact the State's Attorney's office before making decisions about charges and arrests. Police are free to make arrests and press initial charges, but at times, officers may contact the State's Attorney's office if unsure about specific charges, Fleckenstein said. 

In the case of the Severn incident, officers called the state’s attorney’s office before making an arrest or pressing charges. Fleckenstein said her office advised the police to conduct their investigation before bringing the case to the State's Attorney for identifying any possible criminal charges.

“In the other case [in Severna Park], the police officer simply charged [the shooter],” she said.

Fleckenstein said the police department completed their investigation of the Severn incident and met with the state’s attorney’s office last Monday, yet no decision has been made as to whether the department will press charges. 

Patch readers raised questions regarding the incident and, more specifically, laws involving pit bulls and the responsibility of their owners.

Anne Arundel County has no prohibition against specific breeds of dogs, Shanahan said. But he said the aggression of pit bulls and the statistics surrounding their attacks are undisputable.

Prince George’s County prohibits the ownership of pit bull terriers unless the dog was born earlier than Feb. 3, 1997. That means any pit bull younger than 14 years of age is illegal. Pit bull owners in Prince George’s County must provide proof of ownership for any dog that meets the age requirement.

One of the only laws specific to dog owners in Anne Arundel County pertains to leashes.

Every animal, dog or cat, must be on a leash when on public property, Shanahan said. The only exception applies to animals that are involved in the sport of hunting or when the animal is in a designated area, such as a dog park. 

“As soon as you step onto the sidewalk or street, [dogs] must be on a leash. Same thing on a cat,” Shanahan said.

Walking an animal without a leash is a $50 fine, but Shanahan said police rarely stop people for the violation.

The one thing that could get a pit bull, or its owners, into trouble is when the dog acts out with aggression toward a person or other animal.

"We’re not going to mess with dogs that are being messed with, but if it decides to take a chunk out of someone, that dog could be declared ‘potentially dangerous,’” Shanahan said.

Dogs can be labeled as “dangerous” or “potentially dangerous” by Animal Control, depending on the animal’s history of violence.

If labeled to be "dangerous" or "potentially dangerous," dogs may be quarantined at Animal Control's headquarters or within the owner's home, Shanahan said. In the most severe cases, and animal may be put down. 

The threat level of a dog could lead to a $100 fine for owners of “potentially dangerous” dogs or $250 is the animal is proven “dangerous.” 

“It depends on the bites—number of bites, type of bites,” Shanahan said. “If your dog goes out and mauls someone severe enough for stitches, broken bones or disfigurement, Animal Control could declare the dog dangerous and quarantine it.”

*Leslie Hunt, editor, severnaparkpatch.com contributed to this story.

Sheela Na Gig June 26, 2011 at 02:58 PM
Well what Clay Hund has to do is get some documentation, crunch those numbers and send them off Lt. Glenn Shanahan of Anne Arundel County Animal Control and tell him that he is so incompetent, he can't perceive where the problem lays and cannot add. I'll go you one better Clay Hund, not only will I let you combine all shepherds together and all retrievers together, you can combine ALL other dog breeds together and what do you get? Pit bulls alone account for slightly over 1/2 than all other breeds combined. No one accepts your unsubstantiated claims except other pit bull owners, breeders and pit bull ownership rights advocates. And the rest of us are getting pretty sick and tired of you calling law enforcement officers, animal control officers, surgeons, doctors and nurses incompetent and stupid in a feeble attempt to cloud the issue.
Anita Gibson July 06, 2011 at 11:27 PM
If Clay Hund read the Merritt Clifton report then he knows that pit bulls were responsible for 104 deaths - nearly twice more than Rottweilers. That doesn't even factor in the pit mixes. I like pits too but I am getting really sick of people pretending that an American Pit Bull Terrier - aka an American Staffordshire Terrier is not a breed. It absolutely is and, as incredible as it might sound, there are people capable of telling the difference between a Pit Bull and a bulldog.
Clay Hund July 12, 2011 at 07:34 PM
Anita, The problem with Merritt Clifton is that he is a reporter; not a canine professional. His report is riddled with methological errors. Merritt takes the worse of the worst to comprise his report. I am going to take the advice of all veterinarians and other canine professionals, and go with the owner is the issue. Being that many people that own pit bulls are thugs that train them how to attack, if the breed was so naturally vicious, don't you think the death toll would be in the tens of thousands? Funny how a breed type that is supposedly naturally vicious has relatively a small number of kills, considering the general ownership of the breeds. That tells me that the breed is stable, and your Merritt Clifton mention tells me you are form dogsbite.org, and anti pit bull victims bite group that is loaded with bias, propaganda and has no canine background or experience. Good try, but I have been aware of dogsbite.org for a few weeks now, and I have to say, after 5 minutes on their website, I could tell it was heavily flawed and extremely biased.
Shannon August 03, 2011 at 12:06 AM
My pit bull was attacked by a Black lab, of course nothing was ever done about the other dog. I had over $100 in vet bills (I had to pay) now if it would of been my pit that attacked the whole outcome would be different, I would of had to pay the vet bills and probably lose my dog or have her labeled. They need to have same rules for all breeds. Im a responsible pit owner, I have her covered on my homeowners she is spayed and all shots up to date. The Labs owner had none of that, not even a license for his dog.
OneCent May 15, 2012 at 03:20 AM
When the media hears about a dog attack, the first thing they ask? What breed was involved...Lab. Click. German Shepherd. Click. Jack Russell. Click. Collie. Click. Pit Bull. FIRE UP THE ENGINE, ETHEL - WE GOT OURSELVES A REAL STORY!!! To anyone who believes the media and dogsbite.org, please go grab your Enquirer or Star and disregard the following TRUTH & LOGIC. There are MORE bad pit bull breed OWNERS than any other breed & there are MORE pit bull breed dogs & mixes than any other breed & pit bulls get abused, neglected, exploited, chained, isolated, fought and are unsocialized and untrained more than any other breed & short-nosed (brachycephalic), non-pit bull breeds get misidentified as pit bulls the most - skewing pit bull breed number deceptively HIGHER (you never read the next day's correction in small type) & dog bites by other breeds do not get reported as often as pit bull bites & there are multiple breeds lumped together as "pit bulls" and then unfairly compared to single breeds. Pure unbiased mathematical probability tells us that there will be the MOST REPORTED pit bull bites under those circumstances. THE VAST MAJORITY OF PIT BULL OWNERS ARE RESPONSIBLE. THE VAST MAJORITY OF PIT BULL BREED DOGS ARE NOT VICIOUS. HOWEVER, there are so many irresponsible people attracted to this breed for bad reasons, so many irresponsible breeders overbreeding...the counts of attacks end up higher - NOT THE RATE OF ATTACKS compared to other dogs.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »