What is a Board of Education? Is it that big building on Riva Road? Is it the people that work there? Is it the Superintendent? What does a School Board even do? These are all very good questions, and ones that the members of the Board of Education of Anne Arundel County would like to help you answer. Each month, one of the members of the Board will submit a blog entry on current topics that might be of interest to Anne Arundel County citizens. For those of you with children in Anne Arundel County Public Schools (AACPS), some of these issues might be familiar. But for others, they might be topics that are new.
According to Maryland State Law, “educational matters that affect the counties shall be under the control of a county board of education in each county. Each county board shall seek in every way to promote the interests of the schools under its jurisdiction.”
The Board of Education of Anne Arundel County is granted its authority and powers through State law, and is considered a State entity.
The Board is comprised of 9 members. Five of those members are appointed from the different legislative districts in which they reside; three are appointed from the county at-large; and one is a student member. Our Board has the only student board member in the United States with full voting rights. Board members receive an annual salary of $6,000, with the Board President earning $8,000. The Student Board member receives a $6,000 college scholarship after completing his or her term. The current members come from a variety of career backgrounds. Some are working full-time, some part-time, and one is retired.
The Board has responsibilities that fall into the Executive, Legislative, and Quasi-Judicial categories. Examples of our Executive functions, as outlined in state law, include: hiring a Superintendent; appraising the progress and management of the school system through an evaluation of the superintendent; adopting a multi-year strategic plan; communicating with the community, staff and students on educational issues; and ratifying collective bargaining agreements. Our Legislative duties include adopting policies, budgets, establishing curriculum, establishing school boundaries, and making decisions on contract or procurement issues. The school board’s quasi-judicial role involves deciding appeals of the Superintendent’s administrative decisions, deciding appeals of disciplinary actions, and considering recommendations of the Superintendent to suspend or dismiss a certificated employee.
There are generally two Board of Education meetings each month: a daytime meeting on the first Wednesday of the month, and an evening meeting the third Wednesday of the month. In July and August we only hold one meeting a month, and this year, we are holding only one meeting in April due to the Easter/Spring Break. The Board also holds several public budget hearings, and hearings when redistricting is proposed. There are also various work sessions through the year, either on the budget or other topical issues. The Board also holds many non-public hearings related to its quasi-judicial role.
The Board encourages input from the public, whether in person, by phone, or by email. At our two regularly scheduled board meetings each month, we have a “Public Participation” portion of our agenda that allows citizens to speak on any topic for up to three minutes as an individual or five minutes if they are representing an organized group. We also respond to hundreds of phone calls and emails and are available to assist you or answer your questions. If the request is to solve a specific problem, we will generally have to refer you to the appropriate administrative contact, because any decision of the administration that is appealed would eventually come to the Board and we would need to be impartial.
We also frequently take input on AACPS.org website on various issues, from budget issues, to policy changes. In fact, please visit the policy revision page any time to review proposed policy changes and make comments. All of this input from the public better informs the school boards decision making process.
Individual Board members work tirelessly to study the budget, review policies, understand relevant State and Federal legislation, and examine the progress of our school system. Our Board regularly meets with elected officials to advocate for our public school needs. We attend training seminars to improve our skills as Board Members. We are out visiting schools for special events, or just to see what is going on. A Board member might spend somewhere between 10 and 40 hours during a typical week on Board business, depending on the member and the week.
The Board has been charged with providing the constitutionally mandated public education of nearly 77,000 children. When we make decisions as a Board, we must make decisions in the interest of the entire Anne Arundel County Public School System, and not just individual areas. We must understand how the decisions that we make impact the rest of the system and the community. I believe I speak for the entire school board when I say that this is a responsibility that we take very seriously. We encourage you to visit the AACPS website, www.aacps.org, to learn more about our school system. We also hope that you will take some time to read the Board of Education Handbook for more information about the Board and what our members do.
Note: This post was written by Teresa Milio Birge, a Board of Education member from District 32 who resides in Odenton, MD. She has been on the Board for nearly 4 years of her 5 year term.

Amy Leahy
8:28 am on Monday, April 16, 2012
Very informative and I applaud the board members for taking this on, given the emotion and controversy surrounding our board of education. There was a bill before the legislature this year which, if it had passed, would create two Board of Education member elected positions in Anne Arundel County. Mike Busch, the Speaker of the House, adamantly refuses to hear such a bill even though the county delegation voted in favor.
Why is the appointment of our board members such an issue even after the voters of the county passed a referendum supporting the current system of selection?
The answer is simple: Because the members of the Board of Education have no skin in the game….so to speak. They are not elected so the only person they need to answer to is the Governor of the state of Maryland. Not you.
Kari O
8:28 am on Monday, April 16, 2012
What is the Board's position on the current selection process, and the relative merits of having an appointed vs an elected school board? Would the Board welcome the opportunity to have real affirmation of their positions by popular vote? Thanks for the insights into the hard work Board of Ed membership entails. County residents welcome this kid of dialogue!
AACPS Board of Education Members
1:14 pm on Monday, April 16, 2012
Kari O - Thanks for the question. The Board of Education has deliberately not taken a position on the selection process of the individual Board of Education Members, as this would impact us personally, and it is inappropriate for the Board to take positions on legislation that would have an impact on us as individuals, not the school system. So, despite many bills being introduced over the last few years regarding ways to select the members of the board, you will not see any position, pro or con, from the Anne Arundel County Board of Education.
Kari O
8:28 am on Monday, April 16, 2012
err...kind of dialogue!
Amy Leahy
8:03 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
Kari O, please note that the BoE chooses to not take a position on the selection process of board members but it did vote to support three school system unions in a petition drive effort that would effectively raise taxes specifically for the BoE's benefit. The unions will be able to take the tax rate out of the hands of county taxpayers to fund themselves more money.
Jeff Andrade
9:31 am on Monday, April 16, 2012
There are now over 76,000 students now in the Anne Arundel County schools, and the BoE spends half of the County's budget. The stakes are too high and the consequences are too important for the status quo to continue.
All Board members should have to stand for election by the voters of Anne Arundel County, with half having to stand for election to four-year terms in 2014 and the other half standing for election in 2016, with the student member being elected annually. Montgomery County directly elects its Board of Education members, as does Prince George's and Howard Counties. Why not Anne Arundel County? The 2007 legislative changes were a joke.
Democrats are afraid that the voters would put in Republican reformers who would shake up the system, like former Superintendent Eric Smith did a decade ago before the appointed Board and Unions pushed him out in 2005. Unlike our current leadership, Smith, a highly-regarded reformer before and more so after his stint at AACPS, demanded accountabliity and results, and set high expectations. We need that sort of thinking now more than ever.
DioDingo
3:14 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
I don't think politics have much to do with a good education. Eric Smith if memory serves was removed for a number of reasons, taking kick backs, and miss appriation of funds being some of them.
Amy Leahy
1:35 pm on Monday, April 16, 2012
The only way to bypass the legislature and the governor is by petition drive (again) for a ballot referendum. The year before the administration put a referendum forth, Sen. Bryan Simonaire from Pasadena tried to get enough names on petitions to have an elected school board referendum. Not enough signatures were collected - because many were tossed out by the Board of Elections - that the drive failed. Now that we have a very accessible online petition system, we could go for it again with better chances of success.
DioDingo
3:10 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
There was a bill to change the board I thought before the house. For 3 options- stay the same, hybrid board, full election. What happened to that?
Amy Leahy
6:12 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
DioDingo - you are absolutely WRONG about Eric Smith! He was not taking kickbacks and was never even accused of that. What on earth would make you say such a thing? There also was no misappropriation of funds. His only problem was that the school board members and teachers didn't like his leadership and didn't renew his contract. Remember he came in at the same time No Child Left Behind was mandated by the Feds with no funding to accomplish the changes necessary to be in compliance. There was never any hint of impropriety on his part and people need to be very careful making accusations that are not based on fact.
DioDingo
5:38 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
sorry, I'll check my facts. I do remember hearing that about the former Head of the board. Possibly it wasn't Eric, again I'll check.
Jeff Andrade
8:15 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Right on target, Amy. Eric Smith is a stand up guy, the main complaint was that he was working the teachers too hard and butted heads with liberal members of the Board of Education. I have known him since I was on the US House Education and Workforce Commitee staff and he was superintendent for the Charlotte-Mecklenberg County, NC schools. After AACPS he went to Harvard and The College Board and then was successful as Commissioner of Education for the State of Florida for 4 years. He is now Education Policy Fellow at the George W. Bush Institute.
DioDingo, I have found that in this state, and particularly in this county, everything is about politics - especially education. I agree with Amy that the only solution is a ballot referendum that provides for full election of the BoE like the neighboring counties, so that we can get some real change and accountability.
Amy Leahy
9:25 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Jeff…how do I hit 'Like"? My husband who is a former school board member was a big 'fan' of Eric Smith's and it's interesting that he (being a conservative Republican) was not reappointed under this new system because of his values. When the voters of this county passed the referendum on the ballot (a word to the wise….if it comes from the administration it should not be approved) they screwed themselves royally. That approved referendum took the selection of school board members away from the voters and put it absolutely in the hands of the Governor.
Jeff Andrade
8:52 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Ah small world. I should have guessed that from your last name. Mike and Vic Bernson were the only fiscally responsible members of the Board and the only ones to push back on Superintendent Maxwell's wrong-headed budgets and whining war with the County Executive. Unfortunately, things have gone downhill since they were replaced by O'Malley appointees.
Amy Leahy
11:46 am on Thursday, April 19, 2012
It's only going to get worse when the superintendent and APPOINTED school board members get the taxing authority the Maryland Legislature granted to them this session. Beware taxpayers.