patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Ladd Uses Racial Slur, Apologizes During Meeting

The councilman said the term was used by soldiers for North Koreans during the Vietnam War.

 

A county councilman apologized for using a racial slur during a public meeting Thursday, while relating old war stories, first reported by The Baltimore Sun.

The council met Thursday to choose a new councilman for District 1. The six members interviewed 10 candidates, many of whom had extensive military careers.

During one of these interviews, county councilman Dick Ladd (R-5th District), of Broadneck, was joking with councilman Jamie Benoit (D-4th District), about his long military history when he used a racial slur.

"I was in the Vietnam War. It wasn't the Revolutionary War," Ladd said. "I was there when they had … flak jackets and web gear, because we thought the gooks were coming across the (inaudible). Which is the technical term for North Koreans, let the record show."

The word, a derogatory term for East Asians used during the Vietnam War, created a stir in the audience as some gasped and others chuckled.

Later in the meeting, Ladd issued an apology after saying that it came to his attention through modern technology, referring to his cell phone. 

"I need to apologize for that. That was a term out of my past that we frequently used to describe an opponent," Ladd said. "If I have offended anybody, I'll take the hit on that."

The apology elicited applause from many in the crowd. 

Much of the talk during Thursday's meeting was over race and diversity. Former councilman for District 1, Daryl Jones, is black. Many of the questions the council asked candidates involved their perception of diversity and its relevance on the council.

Related Topics: Anne Arundel County Council and Dick Ladd

Judith Moylan-Forman

1:10 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Read the Broadneck Patch to get a very detailed description of last night's so-called County Council meeting.

Reply

Rusty Vaughan

2:40 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

I've heard from several people who attended this meeting. They all agree the behavior is without dignity and respect. It boggles my mind how one can not pay taxes for years until he gets caught then loses his job and goes to jail. BUT, someone with repeated display of prejudice has no accountability. An apology after such a thoughtless ramble is worthless. It is one's basic character where the outbursts are rooted. If there were there a respect for the worth and dignity of others, the outbursts would not occur.
How could a person dispersing campaign funds come close to being appointed for a council position. Even a sniff of conflict should not be considered whether legal or not. The bar must be set higher.

Reply

Judith Moylan-Forman

3:24 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Well said, Rusty. And is this correct? Mr. Ladd's apology came only after he was made aware of his slur thru his cell phone? Am I getting that right? The above also reads that much of the "talk was over race and diversity." Perhaps these councilmen should get some training in diversity, civility and most of all leadership, for they are sorely lacking on all fronts. When you visit the Anne Arndel County web-site, people are invited to share in "our rich heritage":.....According to these County Council members, perhaps it should include, Caucasian and English only.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

D. Frank Smith

6:35 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

What apparently happened is that a reporter was seeking comment from other council members about the slur during the meeting, and word about that got around to him. That's when he chose to apologize.

Sandy

5:36 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Not to mention that Ladd doesn't even make any sense when he's talking about the Vietnam War and then North Koreans. Is he getting his wars mixed up?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

D. Frank Smith

6:37 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

I think he may have just been confused at that moment, because there was a stir in the crowd, and he quickly tried to recover. I wouldn't fault him for that, necessarily.

Aaron Hedetniemi

7:04 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

I was at the meeting, all night! He was simply recounting a HISTORICAL event. This happened, that was the language of the day. You don't hear folks talk like that today, but you can't change history. Get over yourselves people, history is bigger than you!

Reply

Jim Davis

9:37 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

In recalling a time in his life when he was getting shot at routinely by an enemy that we called a lot of things that are socially not appropriate today. I spent two tours as an infantryman and I can assure you that we did not refer to the North Vietnamese or VC with nice names. I'm also quite sure that troops in the "Sand Box" use equally harsh and derogatory names for the Taliban. Get over it, when you are in a life and death situation, you aren't nice and polite. Once it was pointed out what he said, he apologized, Nuff said, End of discussion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chet Brewer

7:59 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

concur, but generally none of the language we used was acceptable for society, I do remember that about every third word started with an f

christine curtin

9:40 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

I think of "he without fault cast the first stone". Have any of you who are damning the councilmen for this unfortunate choice of words ever fought in a war? Obviously if Mr Ladd were thinking that any American would identify with this bad word from the war he would have been speaking in a more guarded manner. It was a mistake, nothing more.

Reply

Park Won-soon

10:09 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Racism is never acceptable. Asian Americans work hard to fight discrimination. My son once got made fun of for winning a math competition. Math is more important then football, but some stupid 7th generation Americans think otherwise and resort to racism to explain their inadequacy.

Reply

big soldier

10:13 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Jim, you can't be serious that serving oveseas justifies racism. I am laughing.

I spent a day or two in Somalia and I never tolerated my men using garbage terms like "raghead" "skinnys" or anything like that. The bigots and racists in my unit might have. Most didn't. I for one believe that our brave men and women can hunt and kill a combat enemy without resorting to racist trash. Ladd and John Grasso are a disgrace to elected office. Walker, Benoit (gasp) and Trumbauer (double gasp) are right this time. Join them Mr. Ladd and bury the hateful tone in AA County.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chet Brewer

7:57 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Big, you didn't go wander in the boonies with no support for 13 months and if you jumped in someones stuff for using that sort of language you would have been ignored or worse

Maylath

12:56 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Oh, ok. I'm just glad it's not Cheryl Ladd !

Reply

Nancy E. Wigal, Search Engine Academy Washington DC

9:41 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

I served in S. Korea, and many of my fellow soldiers thought it was OK to call the locals many derogatory terms, but they got incredibly insulted and outraged when the South Koreans countered back with that Americans all looked alike and had overly large noses and feet. What goes around, comes around. Payback. I used to laugh at my fellow soldier's hypocrisy.

Reply

James Johnson

2:36 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

This combined with the English language bill illustrate that this council is hostile to diversity and wants to return to the good ol boys network. We need to send them a message. These guys do not represent an increasingly diverse and modern county.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maryellen Brady

12:48 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

I think the ENGLISH ONLY bill is an abomination and insult to everyone who is a descendent of an immigrant. We all know that 2nd generation immigrants speak ENGLISH fluently, so the bill is an attack on the new comers. It is also a great disservice to the ppl of the country, considering that the impact would do HARM to others.

Chet Brewer

8:00 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Under the circumstances its not too surprising. The reality for folks who served in the boonies of Vietnam was that you were either fighting Luke (the gook) or Chas (as in victor charlie, VC). Was it appropriate? no, but then most language used when I was in the Army is not appropriate for civilian life

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill Flook

5:12 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

That's the point -- well stated. What's upsetting is that somebody in Mr. Ladd's position could forget that, and be so insensitive to the impact of his own words in such a public setting. It's injected a really unfortunate tone into a discussion that was already way over-heated by the antics of Mr. Grasso. Obviously Mr. Ladd is not a racist. But he's helped to create a really unfortunate impression of where our Council is coming from. I hope we can get over this.

Rusty Vaughan

11:10 am on Monday, February 20, 2012

I am sure that Ladd regrets his slurr. BUT, for what reason? Simply, a council of older, white males cannot understand the challenges of other cultures and races and younger age groups that make up our county. Ladd is only an example of the symptom.
I like Smith's business credentials. I like that Smith has a degree in Technology Systems and experience in technology. I like that he is younger. I like that he has management and leadership experience. I like that having been recently a Marine, he likely has an understanding of various cultures and that the needs/perceptions are different.

Frankly, I am a little put off by the Wagner experience albeit impressive. No doubt he can run a business but his track record is the good-ole-boy politics of yesterday that I would like to move away from. I submit that we invest in Smith, learn from him. We might also use help in getting diversity training for the council. It is less what you say to be PC but more what you feel and understand about having had doors opened and opportunities presented just because you inherited white male privilege. I am from the lunch counter era. I did not stand beside those at the counter. It took major change for me to understand the real message. Darn few of us tall white males know that.
We have the opportunity to get a man with Smith's breadth of credentials. We would be negligent to do otherwise.

Reply

Amy Leahy

11:29 am on Monday, February 20, 2012

I agree with you Rusty Vaughan that we need someone on the County Council who comes from a fresh non-political background. I believe Mike Wagner, being from Glen Burnie and a restaurant owner is the preferred one for the other two Glen Burnie/Pasadena restaurant owners (or workers). Even though he's a Democrat and the other two are Republican I see some of the 'good old boy' system at work here. Allow someone to take a shot at that position who really has a vested interest in doing public service…not just a place holder that the others feel comfortable with.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rusty Vaughan

12:20 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

Thank you, Amy. And I apologize for making a serious error by omitting gender. We need a female perspective on the council just as much as we need cultural understanding.

I read in the paper that a minister yesterday preaching against the marriage bill said that it is not just a law change, it is a society change. Well... duh. Of course it is. A society change is needed too in Annapolis so that prejudice is acknowledged and changed through understanding and acceptance.

Amy Leahy

1:06 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

You realize, of course, Rusty that people are flawed. That makes someone like Dick Ladd, who has never served the public not very savvy when it comes to making remarks in public. His temper-o-meter is not well honed yet. By the same token, someone like Eugene Peterson of the county school board can say whatever he likes because of the color of his skin and no one reins him in. There may be comments here and there but he is NOT elected…he's appointed and therefore answerable to no one. Additionally, someone like Eugene tends to make people more divisive because of his public chastising. I feel like that quote from Pirates "The beatings will continue until morale improves!"

Reply

Maryellen Brady

1:33 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

Does that mean when NASH chastises the parents from Edgewater Elementary that she is just as dismissive and bigoted? For her to say, that she would send her kid to EDGEWATER after hearing about the illnesses that have been occurring is just as prejudicial. These people in non-elected positions, are still SERVANTS OF THE PUBLIC and protectors of the common good. And when they fail to serve and protect, they do a great disservice to the entire community. Children at Edgewater Elementary are more sick, more often because of the bad air and mold. The idea that parents know more than the experts has been time proven to be more often true and dependable than "the expert opinions." When I served on the BD of Appeals, it was a common thought, you could 10 experts in a room and not one of them would agree on the RIGHT solution, solitary solution to a problem or the magnitude of the problem. Nash needs to go.

Reply

Jim Davis

2:37 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

The School board may be "SERVANTS OF THE PUBLIC", but they are like politicians accountable only to their source of appointment. For politicians it is the electorate, who can get rid of them the next time around. Beats me how the public can get rid of someone appointed by a politician or bureaucrat. Perhaps the School Board need to become elected to their positionns.

Reply

Robert Murphy

7:45 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

I am extremely impressed with the level of intelligence and the thought given by the readers regardless of their particular stance. This is a good read and I look forward to future reading here for a grassroots understanding of the pulse of our communities.

Reply

Leave a comment