patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Should ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’ Be Banned?

The racy book, which has sparked controversy in some libraries, is available in the Anne Arundel County Public Library system and has a waiting list of nearly 700 people.

 

If you want to get people fired up, just start talking about sex and censorship. At least that is the lesson libraries across the country are learning thanks to the Fifty Shades trilogy.

The best-selling racy and romantic series by British author E. L. James tells the story of literature student Anastasia Steele’s sexual escapades with young entrepreneur Christian Grey. According to Amazon.com, the books focus on the relationship between protagonists Grey and Steele, with explicit details of the pair's sexual encounters.

The Anne Arundel County Public Library system currently has 265 copies of Fifty Shades of Grey available, and just ordered 15 more audio copies, according to Laurie Hayes, Anne Arundel County Library spokeswoman.

An online catalog search revealed that the library has 59 copies each of the other books in the series: Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed. All of the copies are currently checked out, according to the library's website.

However, not all libraries in Maryland are embracing the trilogy.

The Baltimore Sun recently reported that the Harford County Library system has decided not to carry any copies of Fifty Shades of Grey, despite the popularity of the triology.

"In the case of Fifty Shades of Grey, we read mainstream reviews that characterized the content as pornography," Jennifer Ralston, HCPL materials management administrator, told The Sun. "The library does not purchase pornography, and we therefore did not purchase the book."

The Anne Arundel County Public Library system did not have the same opinion on the book.

“It is a very popular book and people are interested in reading it,” Hayes told Patch. “It doesn’t violate any of our polices, so we ordered it the same way we would order any other book that has generated that much buzz.”

The waitlist for Fifty Shades of Grey currently has about 675 people on it and, according to Hayes, it has been a popular book since it went on the shelves.

In response to a Facebook post that asked if anyone read the book, user Georgia Fowler Brackett commented, “Have read all three. Great book. Each book ended with you wanting more.”

The book has stirred up issues of censorship across the country.

According to an article from ABC News, the Brevard County Library system pulled copies of Fifty Shades of Grey earlier this month. However, due to a public outcry of censorship, the county put the book back on the shelves this week.

“We had originally bought about 200 copies, and none of them are on the shelves because there are 600-and-some people on the hold list,” Hayes said. “I think I am number 543 on the list.”

I confess: This Patch editor just ordered her copy on Amazon. Have you read Fifty Shades of Grey? Tell us in the comments.

  • Should "Fifty Shades of Grey" be banned from county libraries?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        38 (8%)
    • No
        433 (91%)
    Total votes: 471
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: 50 Shades of Grey, Dispatch, Top 5 May 28-June 3, and anne arundel county library

Megan Arts Evans

7:07 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Banned for what? Have you picked-up a Danielle Steele book or any of those "romance novels" with Fabio on the cover? Give me a break! They were a fun read. That's it. The end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marc Riley

8:14 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Banned because Moms are reading this book rather than taking care of their kids! Child accidents have gone up 32.5% since this book was released. On the other hand, Mom morale has gone up 95.3%...so maybe it's a good trade off. ;) I'm not stalking you, I promise!

Comment_arrow

Marc Riley

8:14 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

and those figures were totally bogus, in case you couldn't tell. haha. I'm pretty sure Mommy morale has gone up WAY more than that!

Comment_arrow

Sandi Fleischer

10:03 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

I'm with you Megan - I'm a 65 year old grandmother with 8 grandchildren. It's not just mom's reading the book and your child accident stat has nothing to do with the book release. Tell me Marc - you have kids? Or - is child rearing for the women folk?

Comment_arrow

Marc Riley

6:39 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

Sandi, my wife and I are friends of Megan...yes I have kids, and yes, child rearing is for women only. ;) Kidding.

Tommy Warshaw III

7:22 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

For all of the advances in this country, we're still so repressed.

Reply

Ryan Stavely

8:22 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

From the article:

"In the case of Fifty Shades of Grey, we read mainstream reviews that characterized the content as pornography," Jennifer Ralston, HCPL materials management administrator, told The Sun. "The library does not purchase pornography, and we therefore did not purchase the book."

In other words, nobody from HCPL has actually read the book, and they're just making decisions based on what other people say about it?

Sounds somewhat ridiculous to me.

Reply

Amy Heath

8:26 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

How about Fifty Shades of Severna Park???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marc Riley

8:48 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Reminds me of that old saying, "What happens in Severna Park..." Wait, maybe that applies to somewhere else. ;)

TJ

8:41 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Banned for poor writing and editing, yes! For content? Of course not.

Reply

Tracy

8:43 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

I have read all three books and they are no more explicit then some other romance novels that are currently on the shelves in the library. If you don't agree, don't read the book. I feel that no one had a right to censor the books in a public library. I do however feel that they should ask for ID before most romance novels are checked out. any Danielle Steel, Nora Roberts and Debra McComber are equally descriptive.

Reply
Comment_arrow

StacyW

11:13 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

I completely agree. I loved the books but I wouldn't want my teen daughter reading them. ID would be a great idea but I don't know how it could be inforced or how books could be categorized as needing ID without causing major problems. It could be very subjective as to which books required ID.

Comment_arrow

Ronald

7:32 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

I think they should ask for ID's when checking out the bible. The pictures are graphic and there stories of incest and unmarried sex as well as killing of children. But then, of course, if you don't agree then don't read it.

Carol B

8:50 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

John Milton argued in the seventeenth century that bad books ban themselves: no book should be banned (or boycotted) prior to publication, because people are quite capable of discerning for themselves whether this or that book is something in which the individual is interested, or material of which he or she approves. Public libraries tend to follow the best-seller lists--and they *do* segregate this type of literature from mainstream fare suitable for children, so what's the issue? Many well-written books have been banned in the past that are considered quite tame by today's standards: it would be interesting to know precisely who declared this book "pornography." Whether an individual institution chooses to spend its budget on such stuff should be left up to each library. Ultimately, the most effective form of censorship is up to the consumer: if you don't want to read such a book, don't buy it, or borrow it from the library.

Reply

Diane

10:13 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Isn't it all about choices? You can choose to watch, listen, or read whatever you want. I have a choice, you have a choice, the author has a choice to either write it or not. Isn't it what America is all about? Diane

Reply

Lisa Shore

11:35 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Fifty Shades of Grey is no more explicit than People Magazine, Vogue, etc - which are all available in the library and are prominently displayed in stores. . . .

Reply

Leslie Weston

12:08 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

I read the first volume and yes, it is graphic. But my main problem was that the writing was awful. Really, really awful.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ronald

7:34 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

When it concerns sex then the writing doesn't really matter does it?

angela roberts

12:47 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Censorship, please get over it...we see more nudity/sex on TV then we see in books, books take us to a fantasy world which we probably will never get to experience..Just leave it alone, I want to read what I want, and the more you censor it the more I want to read it, just out of curiosity now.

Reply

Karen

1:58 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

My time is limited, and after perusing a few of the Amazon.com reviews of this book, I decided it wasn't worth my time. It seems like it is laughably bad writing, not unlike the "Twilight" books. (The Amazon reviews are hilarious, by the way.)
I lose patience pretty quickly with bad writing. Furthermore, I am kind of creeped out by the storyline which is something wherein a naive young woman has to sign some kind of contract to be 'owned' by an unrealistically hot and handsome mogul. Yeah right. I wouldn't wish that on my daughter or any other healthy woman I cared about, much less myself. Do I think the books should be banned from the library? No- but the probably should be limited to readers over 18. Honestly, in this day and age when you have Kindle and cheap books available at Target and Warehouse stores, who is going to depend on the library to have access to it. Plenty of people on limited incomes manage to pay for cable TV, smartphones, etc.
I will admit that those of us who trash this book wish we'd written it and were rolling in the dough right now. It's a shame that people respond so well to the Kardashians, Jerry Springer and junk-literature rather than great works of art, but it plays into our corporate culture that values a quick fix and big profits rather than a lasting investment in anything.

Reply

Ronald

7:36 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Jerry Springer plays a mean saphaphone! AND he always has some good advice about how we should love our neighbors and family members at the end of his show. GOD BLESS JERRY SPRINGER - and he gives a geat deal at Liberty Ford!

Reply

Brian

9:31 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Any book worth banning is a book worth reading. I'll pass on it, however the library should carry it. if anything needs to be done about it, perhaps since the library has a children's section, they could also establish an adults only section where material with content not safe for children could be kept.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ronald

11:49 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

Who should decide what would be baned from the children's section? We see how well the censures have done thus far. GOD BLESS THE ACLU!

Amy Leahy

8:17 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

Anyone remember when the Anne Arundel County Board of Education put Maya Angelou's "I Know Now Why the Caged Bird Sings" on the required reading list for high school freshman? My husband and I read the book and decided the sexual content was nothing compared to the racist content.

Reply

Shanna

2:00 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

Has anyone read the book by Ann Rice called Exit to Eden? I borrowed it from the library as a book on tape, and listened to it at work. It was so erotic that i couldn't listen to it at work. I am sure this book can't be any worse than that. And I have read some pretty erotic romance books also. I say leave the book alone and let the people reading them decide on their own. I want to read it now just to see what all the hype is about.

Reply

Jon lapping

5:45 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

It should be banned . All the slutty woman of our time are fantasising about having things put up there arse at the moment , nipple clamps and a man using a young girl as a dirty whore !
What is wrong with these people , whould you be happy with an older man putting things up your daughter arse and whipping her private parts?
The sad thing about this is these young girls will be catching all sorts of STI's and being treated like whores by men who think its ok now to treat woman like this, you idiots who don't want this banned are sick and twisted and I hope it's your daughter who gets it and not mine!!!

Reply

Jon lapping

6:31 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Just read "Karens " review..... well said!!
Wish there was more people who thought like you!

Reply

Leave a comment